In 1948 William Boyd had sold his
Hopalong Cassidy pictures to television, and from 1950 onwards Hollywood released large numbers of films to
what was, in effect, the competition. At first the target audience was almost
exclusively children. Gene Autry was also an early entrant into television
production, with no less than four series in the late 1940s (Range Rider, Buffalo Bill Jr., Annie
Oakley and The Adventures of Champion) offered as syndicated
features for local stations. Another television series which began in 1948 was The
Lone Ranger, which had originated in radio and then spun off into other
media such as films, newspaper strips and comic books, as well as exploiting
the market for children's toys, games and clothing.
For a time the
networks held back on producing Westerns for primetime viewing. But by the
mid-1950s it was clear that there was a sizeable audience for shows that
appealed to adults. In 1955 abc launched
The Life and Legei\d of Wyatt Earp, starring Hugh O'Brian, and Cheyenne
with Clint Walker, cbs began
with Gnnsmoke, which for several years had been a successful radio show,
nbc were slower to find a really
successful series, but in 1957 came up with Wagon Train, starring Ward
Bond, one of the longest running of all television Westerns. Other successful
shows of the late 50s included Maverick, which made the career of James
Garner, and Have Qun, Will Travel, with Richard Boone as the elegant
mercenary Paladin. Within two years the Western had carried all before it. By
the 1957-8 season Westerns completely dominated the ratings. Qunsmoke was
at number 1, Tales of Wells Fargo with Dale Robertson at number 3, Have
Qun, Will Travel at number 4, The Life and Legend of Wyatt Earp at
number 6. By 1958-9 six of the top seven shows were Westerns.
I )ouglas Brode has
identified three distinct types of
television Western, hirst came the
historical hero, as in The Life and Legend of Wyatt Earp, Bat Masterson, or
Jim Bowie. Then there was a vogue for a roving fictional hero, as in Cheyenne,
Bronco or Have Qun, Will Travel. Third was the show built around a
fictional hero in a fixed locale, such as Lawman or Qunsmoke. To
this Michael Barson adds the show based on a family unit, of which the prime
example would be Bonanza, which began in the 1959-60 season and
continued until 1973. The first colour television Western, Bonanza, was
astonishingly successful and was outlasted only by Qunsmoke.
In fact, as Barson
admits, the television Western differed little from its
cinematic ancestor. Television
drew on the same materials, with series about railroads, outlaws, Indians, the
army, about marshals, cowboys, gunmen and settlers. There were even parodies (Maverick
and The Wild, Wild West). Nor was the television Western much
different from other kinds of television show in the dramatic formulae it
employed. As Barson describes it:
'A Western was
likely to draw its conflicts from the range of human drama found across the
spectrum of ancient myths up to and including contemporary issues. A father
unable to communicate with his son; a mob unwilling to tolerate different kinds
of people and beliefs; a wife who no longer loves her husband; a boy, eager to
be recognized as a man; an outsider, eager to become part of a community - any
one of these story premises might one week be the basis for an episode of a
Western, the next the basis for a cop show, a family drama, or an episode of
Star Trek.'
This is not to say
that the television Western lacked originality or artistry, even within the
cramped confines of what were, at the beginning, merely half-hour shows. These
stories had been the stock in trade of Hollywood
for forty years before television picked them up. That hadn't prevented those
in Hollywood
who had it in them from making good pictures. The television Western didn't
lack for talent. It threw up many good actors; among them Steve McQueen from Wanted:
Dead or Alive, James Garner from Maverick, Clint Eastwood from Rawhide.
And two Western series, The Rifleman and The Westerner, provided
the training ground for the last great director of the Hollywood Western, Sam
Peckinpah.
The boom period of
the late 1950s didn't last. As the 1960s wore on innovation seemed to wear out
and few new successful Western shows were introduced. Rawhide had begun
in 1959 and reached the list of the top 25 shows for the season 1959-60, but no
other Westerns achieved real success in the ratings until The Virginian in
1963. By the beginning of the 1970s, as Table 6 (Appendix) shows, the
television Western had gone into a steep decline, moderated but not reversed by
the 'Middle-Western' Little House on the Prairie, which, beginning in
1974, hit number 1 in
the ratings by the end of the decade and lasted until 1983.
What brought about the decline in the television Western was not so much
a fall in popularity as changes in the means whereby television produced a
profile of its audience. Up to the end of the 60s aggregates had been all that
mattered: the number of people overall who were watching a show. But then at
the beginning of the 1970s arose a new method of audience research known as
demographics, which measured not just totals but the numbers of viewers of
different social groups within the aggregate. The networks soon discovered that
though Westerns were generally popular, they were much more popular with
juveniles and among the rural and less well-off part of the population than
with the urban and more middle-class audience. Westerns on television were
finding an audience very similar to that which B-Westerns had traditionally
found in the movie theatres. But since television needed to sell advertising
time, not programmes, it soon realized that it could do better with shows which
appealed to the more affluent. Suddenly, in the 1971-2 season, there was a
pitch for what would now be called the 'yuppie' audience; Westerns, assumed to
be for hicks, were out. The Virginian, it would appear, was just one of
these casualties of demographics.
As the B-Western
declined under the influence of television there was renewed activity in a type
of film that hovered somewhere between the A- and B-feature. This was less
expensive than the full-scale all-star Western, with a cast sometimes of
second-rank stars, sometimes of first-rank stars who were aging a little or
seeking independence from their studios. Such films, often referred to as
co-features (neither top or bottom billing but sharing with a film of equal
status), showed considerable vitality and staying power during the
long-drawn-out decline of the genre from its position of dominance. Examples of
such productions would be the films which James Stewart made with Anthony Mann,
starting with Winchester
'73 in 1950,
or those in which the talents of Randolph Scott, Budd Boetticher, Harry Joe
Brown and Burt Kennedy combined to bring about such minor masterpieces as The Tall
T and Comanche Station.
Despite this, by the
end of the 50s the fall-off in production was there for all to see. Not only
had the independents collapsed (Republic had ceased production in 1958); the
majors too seemed to be losing interest. In 1953 92 Westerns had been made in Hollywood. Ten years
later this had sunk to a mere 11. True, production of all kinds of films in Hollywood was in decline;
but Westerns sank faster. As a percentage of all films made they went from 27
per cent in 1953 to a mere 9 per cent in 1963. Where once much of the financial
stability of the industry had rested on Westerns, now Hollywood seemed to continue making them only
out of habit and nostalgia.